Review: Peter F. Hamilton’s “Judas Unchained”
by Miles Raymer
Peter F. Hamilton’s Commonwealth Saga would be a strong contender for the most disappointing work of science fiction I’ve ever read. This 2000-page duology, which begins with Pandora’s Star and concludes with Judas Unchained, reads like the product of an incorrigibly-garrulous and testosterone-poisoned 16-year-old boy with doctoral degrees in materials science and particle physics. It’s a dismal example of what happens when genuine talent is undermined by a complete lack of editorial restraint.
Upon finishing Pandora’s Star, I was cautiously optimistic that Hamilton would shed some of that book’s obvious faults as he accelerated toward a surprising and satisfying conclusion in Judas Unchained. Instead, Hamilton doubled-down on his bad habits and dragged me into an ever-more convoluted and ungainly narrative. In general, these books are far too plot-heavy and way too concept-light. The concepts and ideas at the center of Hamilton’s world-building are top-notch, but they are buried in page after page of useless filler and interminable action scenes that I found extremely difficult to visualize. Additionally, the cast of characters is far too long, with all but a few key players painfully underdeveloped.
These are not the only features that make Judas Unchained a difficult and frustrating book. Hamilton depicts many of his female characters with prurient, hyper-sexualized language that certainly would have seemed sexist in 2005 and feels downright anachronistic in 2019. Hamilton writes the internal thoughts of women in a way that screams this is what I want women to be thinking rather than this is what women believably think. For example:
He should be exhausted after everything I made him do. She felt a wicked sense of pride at how successfully he’d been corrupted during that long afternoon. I’m a bad, bad girl. And loving every minute of it. (833, emphasis his)
Ugh. To his credit, Hamilton also includes some well-crafted and empowered female characters––most notably the indomitable Investigator Paula Myo. But his recurrent focus on female bodies and clothing, while never rising to the level of bald misogyny, is gratingly adolescent.
Hamilton’s other blunders include but are not limited to: Setting the reader up for big “reveals” that are easily predictable, forcing the reader to follow many boring characters whose fates feel inconsequential while giving short shrift to the few characters who actually engender interest, the general abandonment of the capitalist vs. socialist tensions that enlivened Pandora’s Star, and trying to heighten the narrative’s dramatic intensity with a glaringly false moral dilemma.
This false dilemma deserves a bit of explanation, and centers on the question of whether it’s morally permissible to commit genocide against a hostile alien that’s hellbent on wiping out the entire human race. Hamilton subjects the reader to many tiresome arguments on this topic, forcing otherwise-intelligent characters to defend some blatantly idiotic positions. It was like listening to Jonas Salk debate some nutter who thinks the polio virus is a precious work of nature that ought to be preserved because humanity might “lose its soul” by eradicating it. The final pages of the book hint that the aversion of this genocide may have some long-term positive consequences, but that remote possibility still fails on both moral and practical grounds when confronted with the ongoing risk to humanity (let alone all other life in the galaxy) should this vicious and amoral entity again break out of its containment zone.
Beyond the positive features that I praised in my review of Pandora’s Star, which remain generally consistent throughout Judas Unchained, this second installment includes some additional qualities that merit celebration. Hamilton is preoccupied with the question of how humanity can come together or break apart in the face of an existential crisis––an always-interesting theme that he puts to good use. We watch the Commonwealth’s Dynasties and Grand Families squabble with each other and plan escape routes when their civilization appears to be on the brink of annihilation, and we also watch a plucky minority of these overprivileged assholes learn to make heroic gambles and sacrifices to avert the worst outcomes. Through these developments, Hamilton’s boyish optimism shines through, proving deeply charismatic if also a bit credulous. Despite his considerable flaws as a storyteller, Hamilton clearly loves humans and wishes a bright and exciting future for us. Such sentiment is encouraging in this era of political turpitude and environmental degradation.
Reflecting on the Commonwealth Saga as a whole brings a kind of noxious agitation to my gut. It’s one thing for a writer to have no talent and no good ideas, to simply bring nothing worthwhile to the table. Such situations can’t be truly tragic or disappointing, since one can’t lament of the absence of something that never existed in the first place. But Hamilton is no such writer, and is indisputably endowed with real writing chops and a brilliant mind. For someone of his capacity to fail to condense a set of remarkable ideas into one of the best 500-page works of science fiction the genre has ever seen, and to instead squander them in service of this 2000-page monstrosity––this is unforgivable folly.
Rating: 2/10
Hmmm. Definitely going to skip this one.
Any recent (ie written after about 1975) sci-fi you’d recommend, Miles? I could use a little escapism at the moment.
Yes!
Read Cixin Liu’s “Remembrance of Earth’s Past” trilogy (“The Three Body Problem,” “The Dark Forest,” “Death’s End”). It is the best piece of science fiction I’ve ever read by far and also one of the best works of literature from any genre.
Here are some other standouts I’ve encountered in recent years:
Hard Science Fiction:
“Seveneves” by Neal Stephenson (Would also recommend “The Diamond Age,” and all of Stephenson’s other books are worth reading as well)
Any of Iain M. Banks’ Culture Novels (I recommend starting with “The Player of Games,” but my personal favorite is “Look to Windward”)
“Solaris” by Stanislaw Lew (this one’s pre-1975 but has aged well and definitely worth a read if you’ve never read it)
“Daemon” and “Freedom” by Daniel Suarez
“Blindsight” by Peter Watts
“A Fire Upon the Deep” by Vernor Vinge
Speculative Fiction:
“Theory of Bastards” by Audrey Schulman
“Station Eleven” by Emily St. John Mandel
Experimental Fiction:
“Cloud Atlas” by David Mitchell
“House of Leaves” by Mark Z. Danielewski
“The Particular Sadness of Lemon Cake” by Aimee Bender
“Infinite Jest” by David Foster Wallace (I did not like this book very much but Dad loved it!)
Happy reading!
I agree with every word in this review, but I give the book an 8/10* and the asterisk is this review, which is a 10/10. His treatment of women and sex goes from bad, to worse. But his world-building is phenomenal. Wish I knew of an author that had his chops without his flaws.
Thanks for the kind comment, Bradley, and also for reading my review! I agree that Hamilton’s world-building is impressive––the best aspect of his style for sure.
If you’re interested in top-notch world-building in the scifi space, I recommend:
Cixin Liu’s “Remembrance of Earth’s Past” trilogy (currently my favorite work of scifi)
Iain M. Banks’s “Culture” novels––recommend starting with “The Player of Games”
Adrian Tchaikovsky’s “Children of Time” and “Children of Ruin”
Neal Stephenson’s “Seveneves”
I think all of those exhibit world-building chops equal to Hamilton’s, without the drawbacks. Some readers have a problem with the way Cixin Liu depicts women (or men’s relationship to women), but I found that aspect of “Remembrance” fairly minor and inoffensive, and drowned out completely by his astounding imagination and epic narrative.
Happy reading!
I agree with your review – though I’d rate the book at 6/10 because of the many good features – the wonderful ideas and world building.
But. But But. The self indulgent need to give the back story to every bit of stuff (put it into an appendix; or a separate volume). The adolescent view of sexuality – so off-putting. And the ridiculous moral “issue” of genocide – completely daft when any sane person and ethicist would want to exterminate the life-hating and life-destroying Prime. Not to mention how almost everyone is sort of anglo and refers to 20th Century European and US personalities and events, and car brands. Surely in this future, on so many worlds, there would have been different cultures, and new brands!
If he’d had a good editor, removed 300 or so pages (including the interminable Ozzie trip) it would have been a super novel.
Hi Rob and thanks for your comment! I totally agree with all your points and appreciate you taking the time to share them. Happy reading!
Definitely agree with your review, well said. This had the potential to be as good as Seveneves (which is incredible) if it wasn’t for all the meandering storylines and self-indulgence
Thanks Martyn for reading my review and leaving this comment! Yes, even though a lot of people seemed to be disappointed by Seveneves, I loved it and still consider it to be one of the best science fiction novels I’ve ever read. 🙂
Pretty much sums up my feelings. What a squandered opportunity as the premise is great. The book was extremely long and really meandered. There were three or four books worth of ideas in that one book and trying to mash them all together didn’t do justice to any of them. Did he even have an editor? I really cringed with the female sexuality characterizations. It felt like I was reading one of Heinlein’s later books like The Cat Who Walks Through Walls, which was rather creepy towards women and equally cringe-worthy. In contrast, my big disappointment with Seveneves was that it ended too quickly. The wrap up was just too quick. I wanted another book out of that story.
Hi Todd and thanks for your comment! I agree with you on all points and appreciate you taking the time. I especially align with your sentiments about Seveneves; I would have read at least another couple hundred pages of that book if Stephenson had continued! Maybe he’ll write a sequel one day. 🙂
I have to disagree with most of this review. If you like books where plucky marginalized heroes struggle against one dimensional capitalist villains this isn’t the book for you. The book isn’t the opposite of this either. It does the risky thing and let the reader reach their own conclusions not just on philisophical matters but on hot button topics with close parallels to today. And in this vein Hamilton’s description of Commonwealth society shouldn’t be viewed as an endorsement of it, nor a refutation either.
I think this approach is lacking in fiction today and that’s a shame. Being spoon fed ideological conclusions is cringe worthy even when those opinions happen to mirror your own. I like when even seemingly loathsome characters can be put in contexts where their positive qualities shine and they have a part to play (like real life). I like when spoiled rich oligarchs are portrayed as often smart and innovative, while also greedy and perhaps holding humanity back in an anachronistic economic system. I like how it’s generally upbeat especially now in a cynical angry post 2016 age, and not just in a ‘hoping for the revolution’ kind of way.
People should give the book a try. I’m re-reading it after 15 years and it’s better than I remember. I can say that about very few books I read as a teenager.
Hi there! Perfect review, although I enjoyed all 2000 pages while thinking he really needed a better editor. Wondering if you’ve read his Salvation trilogy – I think he basically took another shot at this series after becoming a much, much better author. Many of the same concepts, but wonderfully done. Still massive, but with enough plot to justify it.
Thanks for the comment, Andy! I have not read the Salvation trilogy, but my friend who recommended Hamilton to me originally did mention that his writing got a lot better over time. Glad you enjoyed it!
Hi Milas and all! While I understand the criticism, I also think that it is more of a space opera than SciFi. I thoroughly enjoy these books, re-read them about 3 times already since purchase (which was pre-Covid). I did read a lot of Robin Cook novels in my childhood which has similar build up in one book instead of two, and loved Star Wars’ space opera style (I also enjoy the Thrawn trilogy although feels forced here and there) maybe this is the reason. For sure it could be better, there are only a few which are good as they are, and surely Rememberance of Earth past is one. Regarding Seveneves mentioned in the comments, I’ve read it twice, and for whatever reason it is one step further away from me than the Commonwealth saga. I believe if somebody is ejnoying space opera and multiple threads, should give it a go.